|
 |
Published in:

Asset Securitization Report The Premier Guide to Asset and Mortgage-Backed Securitization December 1, 2003
|
 |
|
This year's ASR Awards sum-up
Drawing a common theme from
worldwide securitization is not
an easy task, as each marketplace, at
different points of evolution, seems to
have its own story.
With that in mind, we present the
2003 Annual ASR Achievements in
Securitization Awards, a diverse set of
deals, programs and, in a few instances,
turnaround stories fueled by securitization,
though the underlying transactions
themselves may not have seemed particularly innovative. That said, we chose
to honor and recognize achievements
that captured the true challenges of
the market and its participants, as well
as the latest advances in design.
| ACHIEVEMENTS IN SECURITIZATION |
U.S. SECURITIZATION |
| Oncor Transition Funding LLC |
| Runner up |
| Terrapin Funding |
| Honorable mentions |
| Turnaround programs for AmeriCredit and Capital One |
EUROPEAN SECURITIZATION |
| RMBS first-loss tranche for DZ Bank |
| Runner up |
| ELOC No. 16 for BBC |
| Honorable Mention |
| Development of HBOS platform |
LATIN AMERICAN SECURITIZATION |
| Visanet cross-border credit card |
| Runner up |
| Development of Colombian MBS program |
ACHIEVEMENTS IN INNOVATION |
| FIN 46 innovators: Bank of America HSBC and Citibank
| | Runner up |
| Georgetown Funding |
|
On that front, our U.S. securitization
award went to Oncor Transition
Funding, the first of many rate reduction
deals expected out of Texas. Oncor featured many first-time
enhancements, such as performance based
underwriting fees.
Oncor Electric
Revitalizing an entire asset class
Oncor Electric's first stranded cost securitization
was a landmark for the
stranded cost sector,
which at the time
had yet to fully mature. While roughly
three years old, stranded cost ABS, or
rate reduction bonds (RRBs), had been
brought primarily by non-programmatic
issuers, with the intention of
never returning. And although called
rate reduction bonds, most issuers were
more concerned with recovering costs
associated with prior investments made
in a pre-deregulated environment.
With the combined efforts of Public
Utilities Commission of Texas
(PUCT), and advisory firm Saber
Partners, Oncor changed the stranded
cost ABS landscape — creating investor
reporting standards. Issuers in Texas —
the state with the most potential supply
— must allow investors to fully understand
and gauge performance of this relatively
new asset class. The goal of the
PUCT, Oncor and Saber was to achieve
the most inexpensive all-in cost for the
issuer, and in turn keep charges to the
consumer as low as possible.
In addition to increasing transparency
for investors through reporting,
Oncor utilized an unheard of
"performance based" underwriting
fee, rewarding lead and co-managers
for broadening investor distribution
and tightening spreads.
Joseph Fichera , CEO of Saber
Partners calls the performance-based
compensation "revolutionary."
"In Oncor's offering we created additional
relative value through the structure,
increased disclosure and transparency
and broader liquidity by
expanding the buyer base," Fichera said.
"For the bookrunners and co-managers,
we tied compensation to performance
on price and distribution so that everyone's
incentives were aligned — the
investor buying the bonds and the
ratepayer paying for the bonds received
the best deal possible at the time."
The result was broad distribution to
non-traditional ABS investors, with
heavy corporate overlap. Also, Oncor
priced at the tightest levels the sector
had seen to date through secondary
RRB spreads, pricing just behind the
largest and most liquid asset classes of
the ABS market, rather than a "one-off"
collateral type. Moreover, in the weeks
following Oncor's pricing, the entire
$30 billion stranded cost sector tightened
four to 10 basis points, depending
on maturity, and has remained at those
levels throughout the year.
"The concept is essentially investment
bankers earning their compensation
during the underwriting and
sales process, as opposed to being
guaranteed compensation before a
single bond is sold," Fichera added.
"We wanted an incentive-based
compensation plan that prevented
the bookrunners from controlling
everything while giving the co-managers
a greater incentive to work."
The Deals |
| ONCOR TRANSITION BOND LLC 2003-1 |
Date: 8/14/2003 Seller: Oncor Electric Delivery Co. Amount: $500 million Collateral: stranded cost |
| Class |
Amount |
MDY/S&P/FTC |
Avg. Life |
Benchmark |
Guidance |
Spread |
Coupon |
Price |
Yield |
| A1 |
$103.0 |
Aaa/AAA/AAA |
2.00y |
Swaps |
+8-10bp |
+7bp |
2.26% |
99.9827 |
2.269% |
| A2 |
$122.0 |
Aaa/AAA/AAA |
5.00y |
Swaps |
+8-10bp |
+7bp |
4.03% |
99.9872 |
4.033% |
| A3 |
$130.0 |
Aaa/AAA/AAA |
8.00y |
Swaps |
+16-18bp |
+16bp |
4.95% |
99.9683 |
4.955% |
| A4 |
$145.0 |
Aaa/AAA/AAA |
10.8y |
Swaps |
+20-22bp |
+19bp |
5.42% |
99.9768 |
5.423% |
| Credit Enhancement: sr/sub Manager : Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley |
Notes: Settles: 08/21/03; Co-mgrs: Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch |
| |
|